I am supportive of expanding Morpho coverage on Arbitrum as expressed here:
I would like to also echo @chrisb’s observation, since there’s no ETH vault on Arbitrum yet, that would need to be proposed/deployed (via SIP1.Y) before any WETH ARKs can actually go live.
I now understand that the repetition of the ARKs from SIP2.26 is in order to show full support for the Morpho ARKs proposed.
In order to avoid governance overhead from overlapping proposals if they’re functionally the same, I would propose to focus on the SIP2.26 and rewriting/proposing deployment of ETH Fleet on Arbitrum (SIP1.Y), followed by proposal SIP2.Y to include the proposed strategies into the new ARK upon deployment.
Curious about thoughts from @Recognized_Delegates and risk assessment of @BlockAnalitica!