Lazy Summer DAO Delegate Dashboard by CuriaLab

GM Lazy Summer DAO,

With the realization of Governance V2 just last week and $SUMR transferability approaching in January, we are evolving from a curated yield platform into a community-governed, revenue-sharing ecosystem.

With these major shifts, the stakes are immense. Governance now controls every major lever of the protocol, from revenue sharing parameters to incentive allocation, and the responsibility lies squarely with our delegates to ensure these systems reward aligned participation while preserving protocol health.

We believe the true power of Lazy Summer lies in its ability to make DeFi transparent, accessible, and automated. Just as our vaults offer a “set-it-and-forget-it” yield experience, our governance infrastructure must be equally robust and reliable. To ensure this integrity, we are launching the Lazy Summer Delegate Dashboard as a public good for the community.

Don’t Trust, Verify. Our goal is simple: to provide a clear, data-driven view of delegate activity. This dashboard empowers every $SUMR holder to monitor performance and hold representatives accountable. As we vote on decisions that will fundamentally shape the protocol’s future and value accrual mechanisms, this level of transparency is not just a feature; it is essential for maintaining a truly decentralized and effective DAO.

Live Dashboard: https://summerfi.curiahub.xyz/delegate

This thread will serve as:

  • A hub for updates and new features.

  • A space for community feedback to help us refine this vital tool.

  • Where we can work together to define what makes a high-quality Lazy Summer delegate.


Dashboard Overview

The dashboard provides delegate-centric insights to make Lazy Summer governance more accessible and transparent, reinforcing the accountability of those entrusted with voting power over the protocol and its substantial treasury.

Key Features

  1. Delegate Tracking Gain detailed insights into the role of delegates within governance, including:
  • Delegate Name: Displays the name or ENS (Ethereum Name Service) address of the delegate.

  • Delegated Token (% Voting Power): This represents the percentage of total votable tokens that have been delegated to a specific delegate.

  • Delegators: The number of unique addresses who have delegated their tokens to a particular delegate.

  • Forum Score: This score is designed to provide a quantifiable measure of a delegate’s activity and engagement in DAO governance discussions.

  • Onchain Vote: This represents the participation rate over the first proposal the delegate started voting on Onchain proposal.

  • Most Onchain Recent Votes: Shows the latest 5 onchain voted/not voted/not member by the delegate.

  • Status:

    • Active: A delegate actively engaged in voting. They’ve either voted on over 50% of the proposals since their first vote or participated in the latest 5 proposals.

    • Inactive: A delegate with limited voting activities, having participated in less than 50% of the proposals since their first vote.

    • Ghost: A delegate who, despite receiving delegation, hasn’t exercised their voting power.

  1. Forum Score Integration To get your Forum Score to appear, you need to link your accounts. It’s a quick process to prove you own both your wallet and your forum profile.

How to Verify Your Score

  • Connect your wallet to your delegate wallet on https://summerfi.curiahub.xyz/delegate

  • Link your forum account by entering your forum name.

  • Sign a verification message to confirm your identity with your forum handle.

  • Post the generated signature text: Copy the message.

  • Go to the forum and post the generated signature text under this thread.

  • Return to https://summerfi.curiahub.xyz/delegate to complete the verification process.


What’s Next

The dashboard today is just a starting point. To make it truly useful, we need your help to shape its future. Here are two key areas where we’d love your input:

  1. Delegate Score

    A meaningful Delegate Score should reflect our collective values. What does a great delegate look like to you? Here are our initial ideas for metrics to start the conversation:

Metric Definition Why It Matters
Voting Participation Score Measures the percentage of proposals a delegate has voted on since their first eligible proposal. Ensures delegates consistently represent Lazy Summer DAO, upholding the Reliability of our governance system.
Voting Impact Score Evaluates how often a delegate’s vote aligns with the final passing outcome, adjusted by the voting power they used. Highlights delegates who effectively contribute to securing the protocol.
Voting Timeliness Score Tracks how early in the voting window a delegate casts their vote, rewarding proactive participation. Encourages proactive participation, allowing for deeper community discussion and alignment before decisions are finalized.
Rationale Submission Score Assesses how frequently a delegate provides explanations for their votes, both onchain and in forum discussions. Promotes Integrity, allowing any member of Lazy Summer DAO to understand the reasoning behind a delegate’s decisions.
Forum Score Quantifies offchain governance engagement, such as forum discussions, proposal feedback, and proposal initiations. Recognizes vital offchain contributions that Strengthen the Lazy Summer DAO, a primary goal of our governance system.
Number of Votes Cast Simple count of proposals voted on, adjusted for activity windows. Offers a baseline indicator of a delegate’s overall activity level.
  1. Activity Status Definitions

    Are our current definitions for Active, Inactive, and Ghost fair and useful? What would you change?


How You Can Help

This is a community tool, and your input is what will make it truly valuable for Lazy Summer DAO. We’d love for you to get involved by:

  • Share feedback on the current dashboard features.

  • Discuss about the Delegate Score. Are these the right metrics? What did we miss? How should they be weighted?

  • Help us improve our definitions. Your perspective is essential to making this tool fair and accurate.

2 Likes

Hello @Curia I love this! thank you so much for preparing this dashboard. I believe I have set up my profile and it was fairly smooth sail :slight_smile:

On another note, it seems like you are still tracking GOV V1 - which would be great if it could be already shifted to GOV V2 where voting power is derived from stSUMR. I am looking forward to dive deeper into the Delegate Score, and the platform overall to be able to reflect on it after some use.

1 Like

The hub requires an ETH mainnet address, but our Safe for SUMR and other Base DAOs is on Base. Would be great if we can link the actual address we use to vote with on SUMR DAO.

Otherwise really cool dashboard. Like the looks.

1 Like

We discussed this a bit here in the new rules for delegates. Measuring “yapping” is definitely not a clear net-positive for ecosystems. So then you can either introduce “quality” metrics, which someway or another are measuring if you “like” a forum post or not.

Or you incentivize any kind of slop and accelerate dead-internet kind of behaviour.

Imo this needs to be removed or at least not counted.

Ideally governance is very quiet, and the only people talking are the ones with actual skin in the game, expertise and those directly affected by a decision.

1 Like

GM @jensei, glad to hear the profile setup was smooth. Regarding the data tracking, we are updating our data pipeline to also index Gov V2, so the dashboard will eventually reflect stSUMR voting power and the votes on the newer proposal very shortly.


GM @rspa_stablelab, we fixed the the issue on linking Base Safe Wallet, it should support your Safe wallet on Base now. Can you try again?

On the topic of the Forum Score, we completely agree with the goal of prioritizing high-signal contributions over “yapping.” We view the current Forum Score merely as a general forum participation overview, but we believe integrating our Peer Recognition Score (PRS) is the right solution to this trade-off. It uses reputation weighted peer validation to identify quality rather than just volume.

We would be very keen to hear your thoughts on using PRS as the objective “quality metric” for this framework.

3 Likes

Just tried, and it didn’t work. Thanks for iterating here.

1 Like