Thanks @chrisb for the update and interesting news.
First, I’d like to address @Brenner comments and emphasize my agreement wrt
Failing is perhaps a strong word, but I do agree that as I expressed in More growth please , being the best in class in terms of yield sources is JOB NUMBER ONE.
Now, I believe we are close here, and in my view this Iginition opportunity provides a brief window of time to rectify the protocols standing in terms of yield source availability. After which, I believe it makes sense to start to think about how to automate and productize the yield source process, as at the moment it is slowed by governance to a degree. (to be clear, this is good from a risk pov, but its a balance) - once again, this is expressed in More growth please .
Practically speaking that means first getting the approriate yield sources and networks onboarded ASAP via the following RFC and SIPs