When, and under what circumstances should SUMR transfers be enabled

Strategy & Research Protocol Strategy
, , ,
21

It might be useful to get the thoughts of @Raphael_Anode on the yield forwarding idea as well

1 Like
22

Certainly fascinating and a really novel way to incentivize pools here. Leave it to the tokenomics experts to decide. But all in all more demand is good.

3 Likes
23

pinging here @chrisb, @crunchy_vertex, @TokenBrice, and @BaptistellaLabs and the rest of the @TR-WG contributors for visibility :slight_smile:

2 Likes
24

It’s a great design and well in line with our perspective of potential collaborarion to reduce the costs of incentivization. The only downside is Summer’s perspective is that you have to pair against OETH not ETH, and that means extra hop, fees, and routing complexity for the simple SUMR<>ETH route if that is our main pool. For that reason, I’d see this fitting more for a secondary pool.

2 Likes
25

responded in the other thread here!

1 Like
26

As part of the discussion to enable SUMR Transferability, I provided an update here re. proposed timeline and technical next steps: Staking V2 & Governance Upgrade, leading to SUMR Transferability - Proposed Timeline and Actions

2 Likes
27

A new update has been posted in the thread re. timelines.

TLDR; There is a week delay to the originally posted timelines. SUMR Transferability will now most likely be enabled on 18th November (from 11th Nov originally).

Full details can be seen here: Staking V2 & Governance Upgrade, leading to SUMR Transferability - Proposed Timeline and Actions - #7 by chrisb

1 Like