[RFC] Arbitrum USDC Vault (OLD) User Reimbursement

[jensei]

This is a very good question @MasterMojo, at the end of the day it is always up to the DAO. As far as my personal view on this goes → NO.

@jensei

Applies exclusively to depositors affected by the Silo sUSDX/USDC (127)

&

@jensei

2.3 Moral Hazard and Incentive Alignment

A crucial insight from the previously mentioned Euler thread is Hasu’s warning:

“If a platform compensates deposits unconditionally, curators capture upside while offloading downside to the protocol.”

Lazy Summer DAO must avoid this trap. Therefore, this RFC seeks input for the following:

1. Compensation: if-any; one-time, exceptional, and vested.

I would advice strongly against setting this precedence. For this specific case (pre-guardian control) I consider this as a one-off approach to address the problem at hand.