# \[RFC\] SUMR Liquidity management on Base

**URL:** <https://forum.summer.fi/t/rfc-sumr-liquidity-management-on-base/629>\
**Category:** Request for Comment \[RFCs\]\
**Tags:** rfc, base, sumr, liquidity\
**Created:** [January 14, 2026, 1:20pm UTC](https://forum.summer.fi/t/rfc-sumr-liquidity-management-on-base/629 "2026-01-14T13:20:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jensei](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex009/user_avatar/forum.summer.fi/jensei/32/69_2.png) [@jensei](https://forum.summer.fi/u/jensei)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2026, 5:14pm UTC](https://forum.summer.fi/t/rfc-sumr-liquidity-management-on-base/629/3 "2026-01-14T17:14:30Z")

</div>

Welcome @Thomas and thank you for bringing this one up! I do like the DAO control, performance-only fees, and the ability to evolve the strategy over time in your proposal. I definitely support starting simple (broad range) and iterating based on observed market behavior.

Pasting below my only worry here that I wrote to @MasterMojo proposal on Aerodrome Metagovernance:

> [@\[RFC\] Aerodrome Metagovernance](https://forum.summer.fi/t/rfc-aerodrome-metagovernance/626/6):
>
> with around $225k in the DAO Treasury: the **veAERO** and the **Arcadia Pro** (proposed by @Thomas) allocation would fully deplete all the liquid assets. I am not 100% sure that would be a smart move - but do not want to sound short-sighted.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.summer.fi/t/rfc-sumr-liquidity-management-on-base/629)._