Let’s run a simple simulation of the proposal as offered: how would the outcome of the recent Arbirtrium USDC vault bank run have differed under this regime, versus the prior standard?
I’m interested in understanding the proposal in relation to an incident, versus in theory.
–
Separately: I’m split on compensation expectations. Volunteering may not align expectations with incentives adequately, while fixed stipend has the opposite effect of reward regardless of engagement. The middle ground of incident-based comp seems like a decent middle-ground, which I could see working as…
“IF Guardian met 3.3 Guardian Responsibilities & Expectations for incident XYZ, THEN disburse share of Guardian-alloted reward pool to this + other incident-engaged Guardians.”