Hello @MasterMojo! Thanks for the ping, I have setup a pipeline with @samehueasyou to funnel strategies proposed (found on the Forum) to the @BlockAnalitica - to streamline the process. I believe ExtraFi proposal was not yet sent to them.
At the moment, I believe that it has been set as a:
- Lower priority than HyperEVM deployment
- @BlockAnalitica is “only” doing top 3-5/ reviews a week
The Hyperliquid / HyperEVM deployment was indeed posted earlier: [RFC] Deploy Lazy Summer Protocol to Hyperliquid HyperEVM (and pre-deploy on select new networks with 0 deposit caps)
At the same time, I want to point out that there is nothing stopping anyone from pushing into SIP (SIP2.43) and even an onchain vote with 0 caps settings proposed for BA to adjust / work with after the vote. Its just for the sake of the process (preventing double-work; e.g.: LR/HR deployment) that this pipeline was established with them.
Maybe recently posted risk tier classification could be helpful here: BA Labs baseline criteria for recommending new ARKs - #3 by BlockAnalitica
Also, deployment of said ARK would have to occur pre-vote I believe. Maybe @halaprix, or @FBrinkkemper has some thoughts on the complexity of this ARK?